نگرشی به تلمیح ادبی براساس رویکردهای نوین در نقد ادبی و مطالعات بینارشته‌ای

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی -نظری اصیل

نویسنده
استادیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی / دانشگاه اراک
چکیده
گسترش مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در سال‌های اخیر سبب ایجاد تنوع در نگرش‌ به مباحث ادبی به‌ویژه در زمینۀ نقد ادبی در ایران شده است. حال آنکه در این پژوهش‌ها توجه به استفاده از این ظرفیت‌های بینا‌رشته‌ای برای شناخت دقیق‌تر و ایجاد تحول در سایر زمینه‌های ادبی، همچون بلاغت و زیبایی‌شناسی کلاسیک شعر فارسی، تاحد زیادی مغفول مانده است. ازاین‌رو پژوهش حاضر درصدد است به‌شیوۀ توصیفی ـ تحلیلی به مبحث تلمیح در بلاغت بپردازد و این عنصر بلاغی را براساس رویکردهای مطالعاتی نوین بینا‌رشته‌ای و نقد ادبی واکاوی و معرفی کند. نتایج پژوهش بیانگر آن است که تلمیح، علی‌رغم سادگی ظاهری خود، یکی از پیچیده‌ترین و چندلایه‌ترین عناصر بلاغی است که می‌توان آن را با استفاده از دستاوردهای نوین رشته‌های مختلفی همچون زبان‌شناسی، نشانه‌شناسی، جامعه‌شناسی و برخی دیگر از نظریه‌ها و مباحث نقد و نظریه ادبی جدید بررسی و واکاوی کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

An Attitude to Literary Allusion Based on New Approaches to Literary Criticism and Interdisciplinary Studies

نویسنده English

Zahra Rajabi
Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature Department / Arak University
چکیده English

In recent years in Iran, the development of interdisciplinary studies has caused a variety of attitudes toward literary topics to be created especially in literary criticism. However, in these studies use of interdisciplinary capacities for a more accurate understanding and creating transformation in other literary fields such as rhetoric and classical aesthetics of Persian poetry has largely been neglected. Therefore, the present research seeks to address allusion topic in rhetoric by a descriptive-analytic approach and to identify and introduce this rhetorical element based on new interdisciplinary studies approaches and literary criticism. The results of the research indicate that allusion despite its apparent simplicity is one of the most complex and multilayer elements of the rhetoric that can be examined and looked up using the modern achievements of various disciplines such as linguistics, semiotics, sociology and some theories and discussions of literary criticism

کلیدواژه‌ها English

interdisciplinary studies
Literary criticism
Rhetoric
allusion
Ahearne- Krool, Stephan P. (2007). The Psalms of Lament in Mark's Passion: Jesu's Davidic Suffering. Cambridge University Press.
Allen, Pasco H. (2002). Allusion: A Literary Graft. Rookwood Press Charlottesville.
Barthes, R. (1978)."Lesson in Writing" in Image, Music, Text .New York: Hill and Wang.
Ben- Porat, Ziva. (1976). “The poetics of Literary Allusion”. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature. 1: 105-128.
Boer, Roland. (2007). Bakhtin and Genre Theory in Biblical Studies. Society of Biblical Literature. Atlanta.
Cuddon, J. A. (2013). A dictionary of Terms and Literary theory.
Halliday, M. A.K and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Heylen, Susan. (2005). Allusion and Meaning in John 6. W de G. Berlin. New York.
Hutcheon, Linda. (2000). A Theory of Parody: The Teaching of Twentieth- Century Art Forms. University of Illinois Press. Urbana & Chicago.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
Khorsandi Tāskouh, Ali (1388). "Typological diversity in interdisciplinary education and research". Quarterly journal of interdisciplinary studies in humanities. The first period (p. 4). 57-83.
Irwin, William. (2011). “What is Allusion”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 59, No. 3. 287-297.
Jernigan, Daniel; Murphy, Neil; Quigley, Berndan and Wagner, Tamaras.(2009). Literature and Ethics: Questions of Responsibility in Literary Studies. Cambria Press, Amherst, New York.
Lennon, Paul. (2004). Allusion in the Press: An Applied Linguistic Study. Mouton De W.G Gruyter, Berlin.
Mezo, Richard. E. (2001). Concept and Choices: A Writer's Companion and Personal Advisor. Universal Publishers. Parkland, Florida USA.
McCareek, Irene Rima. (1385). Guide to contemporary literary theories. Translation by Mehran Mohajer and Mohammad Nabavi. Printing 2 Tehran.
Mirashak, Yusufali. (1388). A conversation or woman is crucified. Printing 1 .Tehran: Development of the Book of Iran.
Naciscione, Anita. (2010). Stylistic Use of Phraseological Units in Discourse. Jhon Benjamins Publishing Company. Amesterdam.
Perri, Carmela. (1978). “on alluding”. Poetics 7, North Holland Publishing. 289-307.
Purdy, Dwigh .H. (1994). Biblical Echo and Allusion in the Poetry of W. B. Yeats Poetical and the Art of God. London and Toronto: Associated university Presses. Bucknell university press.

Reynolds, Christopher. A.(2003). Motives for Allusion: Context and Content in Nineteenth- Century Music. Harvard University Press.
Richardson, Jack. (2006). Illustrated Dictionary of Literature. India. Lotus Press.
Ricks, Christopher. (2004). Allusion in the Poets. Oxford University Press.
Rzyman, Aleksander. (2017). The Intertextuality of Terry Pratchett's Discworld as a Major Challenge for the Translator. Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
Selden, novel. (1392). Contemporary Literary Guide. Translation by Abbas Mokhtber. Printing 5 Tehran: Awareness.
Sommer, Benjamin. D. (1998). A Prophet Reads Scripture: Allusion in Isaiah 40-46. Stanford University Press, California.
Stam, Robert; Burgoyne, Robert; Flitterman-lewis, Sandy. (1992). New Vocabularies in Film Semiotics: Structuralism, post Structuralism and Beyond. Routledge. London and New York.
Tomaszkiewicz, T. (2004). Terminologia tłumaczenia (red.) Delisle J., Lee-Jahnke H., and C .Cormier M. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Van Tress, Heather.(2004). Poetic Memory: Allusion in the Poetry of Callimachus and the Metamorphoses of OVID. Brill, Leiden. Boston.
Watson, Alex. (2012). Romantic Marginality: Nation and Empire on the Borders of the Page. Taylor & Francis Group. London and New York.