This essay aims to answer the following questions by examining all publications in Persian-language journals concerning Hujwiri and his work Kashf al-Mahjub: 1. What approaches exist in articles related to Kashf al-Mahjub? 2. Which approach has the highest frequency, and what are the reasons for it? 3. What are the most important achievements of key articles in each approach? 4. What are the primary shortcomings and flaws in these studies? Up to the fall of 1404 solar (approximately October 2025), there are 114 articles in this field, ranked by frequency as follows: 1. Research on specific topics in Kashf al-Mahjub, 2. Literary criticism and theory, 3. On Kashf al-Mahjub and Hujwiri, 4. Influences received and exerted by Kashf al-Mahjub, 5. Textual criticism, 6. Examination of narrative elements, and 7. Stylistics. The publication of Mahmoud Abedi's edition of Kashf al-Mahjub in 1383 solar (2004 CE) appears to be a key factor in drawing researchers' attention to the book.The method employed in this study is descriptive-analytical and critical. The examination and analysis of the articles are based on components such as main theme, approach, critique of strengths and weaknesses, influence from prior sources, and the presence of new and original insights.The final section of this essay is devoted to the pathology of the published articles. The most significant weaknesses include repetition of content, failure to uphold scholarly integrity, publishing the same article with identical structure and content in two journals, lack of sufficient coherence, absence of clear conclusions, and mere descriptive presentation.