Volume 12, Issue 46 (2019)                   LCQ 2019, 12(46): 155-187 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

fourjanizadeh S, Khorasani M, Rashidi M. Study of the Inappropriate and Mechanistic Applications of Vladimir Propp’s Morphology Theory in the Persian Literary Texts. LCQ 2019; 12 (46) :155-187
URL: http://lcq.modares.ac.ir/article-29-33418-en.html
1- Ph.D. student, Persian Language and Literature Dept., Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
2- Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature Dept., Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran , najafdan@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Persian Language and Literature Dept., Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
Abstract:   (6274 Views)
Structuralism is one of the most important areas of the modern literary theory, which has contributed to the creation of new subjects, the evaluation of similarities and differences, and the possibility of the analysis of the Persian literary texts based on standard universal models. Recently, Western literary theories have been increasingly used in the analysis of many literary research studies in Iran, aiming to shed some light into the hidden aspect of literary works and provide new insights. And few studies have ever not used structural and morphological approaches in their literary analysis. Based on a review of the Persian literary morphological studies conducted in different decades, the present study aimed to analyze the growth of them qualitatively and quantitatively and also to analyze their literary genres. Further, it investigated the degree to which Propp’s morphology theory has been used in a standard scientific way in these texts. Finally it was concluded that the inappropriate and mechanistic applications of Propp’s morphology theory in the Persian literary texts have led to inappropriate theory selection, simplification story elements, disregarding the goal and context of the theory, repetition of the method, poor introduction, and unrelated conclusion.
Full-Text [PDF 651 kb]   (1729 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Structural critique
Received: 2019/05/29 | Accepted: 2024/02/3 | Published: 2019/10/2

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.