In the story of the Edrissis' House, social perceptions and habits, apart from being able to form a historical study, depict social causes and reflect the author's mentality and social situation. The main points of the story are wandering characters who are immersed in the foggy and bitter memories of their past as if reviewing these memories is sweet or very annoying and painful for them. Mrs. Edrisi, the owner of the ancestral home (Edrissis' House), is still stunned by the fantasy of her youth and her love for the fire brigade. In this story, spatial, temporal, and narrative themes are the tools to describe realistic and critical structures. After the Bolshevik and workers' revolutions, Mrs. Edrisi, a member of the aristocracy, has witnessed profound changes in the urban situation amid popular discontent. The narration in this story is an excuse to describe and explain the linguistic structures and meanings that lie on the one hand and social realities and political conflicts on the other. In the context of Edrissis' House, "meaning" plays out the form and content of the narrative, to remove the potential of Alizadeh's language from the linear barrier and to define the subject in the heart of a dynamic and out-of-structure process. Therefore, to clarify the game of narration from the perspective of semiotics in this story, the position of the sign and its structure must be identified to some extent. For poststructuralists, language systems, events, and events are formed over time. Kristeva, a Bulgarian psychoanalyst, linguist, and poststructuralist philosopher, reviewed her linguistic structures by writing her first book, and investigated the Semantic features , emphasizing literary and poetic texts in historical and social contexts. She showed the dynamics of sing by which processes change themselves. Chora is a symbol of Kristeva's energy, dynamism, and vibrancy, her inner drive, and signifier of language. Thus, the identification of linguistic cues for Kristeva is "the study of the mechanisms of production, transmission, and reception of meaning". In this article, we will try to answer questions about the analysis of symbolic structures and sign language in the novel of the Edrissis' House and pave the way to research in similar contexts. Although we see the presence of both realms in the story, it is a symbolic realm that deeply affects "meaning" in Alizadeh's view. As mentioned above , the destruction of the linear course of the narrative in the story, affects the linguistic structure of Alizadeh and shows the linguistic reality before the author's consciousness.
The novel Edrissis' House, always depicts a few unfinished and wandering stories, the realistic appearance of which contains analytical and obscure signs of the past. This is the realm of signs that leads the nests and the amalgam to the language. In other words, this emotional and fragmented dimension of language is fluctuating, it requires identity and signification for itself, and it puts the subject's consciousness in suspense, so that the meaning is not of the material and conscious type, but based on the inner motivation and drive of production. Thus, the unveiling of emotional and emotional structures and the penetration into the inner layers of motivational language, a reflection of the field. It is a language that has been suppressed and needs to return. Alizadeh prioritizes the nature of language and re-represents its nature to provide the reader with the conditions for understanding and recognizing it. In fact, Alizadeh shares her experiences in the context of narrative and social contexts - which also include language itself. Retrieves - gives meaning and, by searching for intra-cultural links, shows semio-semantic functions for textual structures. Thus, in semiotic analysis of Alizadeh's text, the signifiers lose their order and become dynamic and irregular to evoke the return of the blind or the "command of oppression." Hence, the suppression of female mental beauty shows the focus and symbolic structure of Alizadeh's language. This process itself becomes the originator of language. A language keeps emotions stored and registered in the subconscious layers of meaning. A language in which the interaction with the environment takes the form of unconscious reactions. In the story of the Edrissis' House, Alizadeh, amid its sharp and biting realism, is deeply influenced by the field of symbolism, because the symbols transform its subjects. The emotional burden of the narrative language becomes more and more imposed on readers.
The novel of Edrissis' House is the story of the Tsarist Russian Bolshevik Revolution, which illustrates these two linguistic areas well. And the position of Alizadeh's heroes is manifested not only in language but also in physical motivations. In this story, the environmental space of the Edrissis' House represents the symbolic space of language, which dominates the ample space and profoundly influences the process of signification. In fact, according to Alizadeh, language as a social act necessarily has these two tendencies of symbolism and semiotics because these two linguistic domains produce meaning.  Therefore, according to Alizadeh, this matter and the feminine (symbolic) domain is the reproductive text that forms the masculine (symbolic and lawful) matter of the apparent text and precedes the cultural, social and historical rules. The subject of Alizadeh, inspired by her feelings and energy in the heart of nature and the unconscious, creates a system of signification and discourse. Overall, the linguistic signs in this story are unstable, repressed, spontaneous, and emotional. This rupture reproduces the symbolism of "meaning" and, according to Kristeva, is revolutionary in the realm of signification and semantics. Hence, language and subjectivity are intertwined for Alizadeh’s point of view. For this reason, the realm of symbolism is the style and representation of unwanted signification. 
 

Considered as the climax of the text-narrative, the ending of a text often includes the resolution. However, depending on the dominant epistemology of the text and the status of textual subjects, the ending can also lead to other implications. Among classical Persian texts, the endings of some mystical texts, including the ghazals in Dīvān-e Šams, are distinctive. In this paper, the endings of the ghazals in Dīvān-e Šams have been interpreted in a descriptive-analytic way. The analysis showed that the narrator-lover of the ghazals, in line with the epistemology of the text, appears as the temporal subject of the text at the beginning, but rejects the role at the end and by employing silent speech acts, retracts to the prelinguistic world. In other words, in nearly most of the ghazals the narrator-lover represents the anxiety and longing for the lost unity at the beginning, but in the end, by employing two sets of silent speech acts (“silence as not speaking”, and “silence as speaking for other”), renounce to the present moment. Therefore, the studied ghazals do not come to an end and by using a circular structure, they perplex the reader-participant with an unfinished experience, allowing the reader to feel as part of the represented experience.

Simin Behbahani, Hossein Manzavi, and Mohammad Ali Bahmani, together forming the new Persian Ghazal (short lyric poem) triangle, made significant changes in contemporary Persian Ghazal. Iranian poetry and prose quickly incorporated symbolism into their poetry and prose as one of the essential schools of modern literature. In this study, the researchers have analyzed about 400 symbols in the new Ghazal of the mentioned poets, according to Mahmoud Fotouhi's division of symbols into three categories: micro-, macro-, and structural symbols. They include the analysis of statistics and frequency of symbols, the origins, the concepts, the factors of creation, and the analysis of samples. Among the 326 micro-symbols studied, nature with 73% is the most important source, with a frequency of 326 applications. There are about 14% human symbols and about 11% human-made structures. The Ghazals of the period make little use of macrosymbols. Nevertheless, the organic symbols that have developed into a new art form in contemporary literature appear frequently in Ghazals of Simin, appearing 69 times, making her work distinguishably different from others.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Symbolism is based on axes such as ambiguity and polysemy, and symbols are signifiers that, in addition to explicit concepts, also refer to implicit concepts. The French philosopher and writer Paul Ricoeur, in defining the symbol, says that every signifying structure, has not only the specific and direct primary and literal meaning, but also another meaning which is indirect, secondary and virtual, and this other meaning is obtained only through the primary meaning (Ricoeur, 1974/a, p. 12).
In contemporary literature, symbolism is one of the important schools that has quickly opened its place in Persian poetry and prose. New poetry has been a pioneer in this field with the initiation of Nima Yooshij, and as a result, classical poetry, including the form of ghazal and then the new ghazal, has seen such developments.
Simin Behbahani, Hossein Monzavi and Mohammad Ali Bahmani, as the three sides of the new ghazal’s triangle, made fundamental changes in contemporary ghazal. Among these changes, these poets approached symbolism by implicit expression of political and social issues in order to avoid the consequences of frankness and clarity of speech.
Symbols are generally divided into artistic and non-artistic ones according to the nature of their function. Rhetoricians divide symbols into different categories in terms of their innovation or circulation, the most important of which are conventional or public symbols and individual, personal or innovative symbols. Mahmoud Fotouhi considers the relation of symbol with the texture of poetry to be studied in three parts with a structural and conceptual view. In this article, the authors have analyzed the symbols in the new ghazal, according to its three categories in the book of “rhetoric of image” with the titles of micro-symbols, macro-symbols and organic symbols.
Methodology
The methodology of the current study is based on the nature of data in accordance with the descriptive and analytical model and the purpose of selecting this model was to identify the symbols and then to analyze the content from statistical, stylistic, structural, aesthetic and categorical perspective.
Results
By studying the collection of ghazals of the pioneers of new ghazal, Simin Behbahani, Hossein Manzavi and Mohammad Ali Bahmani, the authors have extracted about 400 symbols and analyzed them in three sections of micro-symbols, macro-symbols and organic symbols based on Mahmoud Fotouhi's categorization. And in fact, this article looks at categories that include: statistical and frequency analysis of symbols, their origins, their concepts, innovations, factors of creation, comparison and analysis of samples and data. In the study of micro-symbols, with a frequency of 326 applications, the element of nature with about 73%, has the most important origin. Human symbols with about 14% and human handicrafts with about 11% are in the next stages. Macro-symbols have been used sparingly in the ghazals of this period, but the organic symbols that have formed a new artistic form in contemporary literature, have a significant frequency in the ghazal of Simin Behbahani with a frequency of 69 items. It can be considered as one of the special features and distinct characteristics of her ghazals.
Conclusion
The result of this article can be divided into four categories:
1. Origin: Organic symbols have more than two origins, human and nature, but micro-symbols of this period are notable in terms of their high frequency.
a) Nature: In the study of the micro-symbols of the new ghazal, the element of nature has a more significant frequency, which has appeared respectively in Behbahani, Monzavi and Bahmani’s ghazals. Among the various elements of nature, the element of color and nature in its general meaning, and in the next stage, the element of time, are the most frequent.
b) Human: Micro-symbols with human origin of ghazals of this period are not very frequent. In this section, dominator is symbols with mythological origins and the most important reason for its emergence is the political and social content of the ghazal of this period and its goal is motivating the audience.
c) Human handicrafts: Micro-symbols of this period with the origin of human handicrafts have been found to be less frequent than other patterns. What seems remarkable in this area is the fifty percent use in Bahmani's ghazals.
2. Innovation: The micro-symbols of this period, although considered new in contemporary literature, are not personal; and symbols that are more personal, sometimes had occasional uses in the poems of others. However, in this section, the organic symbols of Simin, such as Koli, Sara, Ilkhan va Zohre, Khar haye zesht, Neyzar, etc. can be considered as personal and private symbols of the poet.
3. Concept: Symbolism in Persian poetry and literature is fundamentally different from its western version, which is based only on artistic arrangements, emphasizing on the doctrine of "art for art's sake”. In the ghazals of this period, the symbol is considered as one of the dominant artistic functions among the various forms of imagination. But of all these rhetorical techniques, none has found more anti-oppressive function.
4. Factors of creation: The factors of creating the micro-symbols of this period are mostly socio-political issues of the poet's time and artistic requirements, then intellectual, philosophical, spiritual and psychological factors. In organic symbols, domination is with socio-political factors that we sometimes see the combination of various factors in Simin's personal symbols in which both political and social issues, intellectual and philosophical ideas, even issues and psychological sufferings of this group are discussed.