The present article reviews the book “National Identity in the Folk Tales of the Safavid Period” by Mohammad Hanif. In the introduction to this 317-page book, the author claims that the main purpose of research is to find different aspects of Iranian national identity in Safavid folk tales and then claims that after examining the issue of identity, the author will try to study the texts. Answer questions about identity. Mohammad Hanif has well understood the issue of the importance of identity in the Safavid era and its connection with the stories of this period and tries to represent this issue in the book National Identity in the folk tales of the Safavid period. But there are fundamental flaws in his work, four of the most important of which will be mentioned in the aricle.
حنیف، محمد. 1394. هویت ملی در قصههای عامة دورة صفوی. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
علیزاده شعرباف، مهرداد. فتوحی رودمعجنی، محمود. ذوالفقاری، حسن. (1399). "نمود تکوین ایران به مثابه واقعیتی جغرافیایی در قصهی حسین کرد شبستری". مطالعات ملی، 21(3 (پیاپی 83) )، 25-44.
فخرالزمانی قزوینی، عبدالنبی. 1392. طرازالاخبار. تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
محجوب، محمدجعفر. 1386. ادبیات عامیانة ایران (بهکوشش حسن ذوالفقاری). تهران: چشمه.
alizade sharbaf,M. (2021). Critique of the Book âNational Identity in the Public Tales of the Safavid Periodâ by Mohammad Hanif. Literary Criticism, 14(55), 179-193.
MLA
alizade sharbaf,M. . "Critique of the Book âNational Identity in the Public Tales of the Safavid Periodâ by Mohammad Hanif", Literary Criticism, 14, 55, 2021, 179-193.
HARVARD
alizade sharbaf M. (2021). 'Critique of the Book âNational Identity in the Public Tales of the Safavid Periodâ by Mohammad Hanif', Literary Criticism, 14(55), pp. 179-193.
CHICAGO
M. alizade sharbaf, "Critique of the Book âNational Identity in the Public Tales of the Safavid Periodâ by Mohammad Hanif," Literary Criticism, 14 55 (2021): 179-193,
VANCOUVER
alizade sharbaf M. Critique of the Book âNational Identity in the Public Tales of the Safavid Periodâ by Mohammad Hanif. Literary Criticism, 2021; 14(55): 179-193.
Literary Criticism
