Volume 10, Issue 37 (2017)                   LCQ 2017, 10(37): 107-134 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

peyghambarzadeh L S, fallah G, nojomian A. Narrative Author; In critical dialogue with ideological discourse of the sixth decade. LCQ. 2017; 10 (37) :107-134
URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-29-7328-en.html
1- مدرس دانشگاه
2- kharazmi
3- beheshti
Abstract:   (1520 Views)
This essay denotes the context for observation of cultural behavior of the sixth decade according to cultural formation and discourse analysis of this decade, those groups into the same historical era who have the same experience from the particular social occurrence - the WAR and holy defense. In this analysis of generation dependencies, theories, judgments and common values are studied about stable phenomenon, common meanings which is in the field of experience from the hidden generation, and transfer in this decade narrative stories. In this present essay to understand the interrelation of generations for narrative authors, we assist two terms: 1. the qualification that bring social sources and areas for this changes, and 2- the qualifications that come to form the content and ideological setting, and shows that traditional revolutionary ideological discourse creates a vast array of new ideas through the production processes, selection, and institutionalization which in significant way deployed the ideology of official and cultural deep-seated institutions. This discourse is a function of cultural formulations of sixth decade that is created in order to the crisis in moral system, resources mobilization, and the formation of chains of interaction among the cultural elites. In this cultural context, narrative authors advocated dominant discourse with their new ideas and provoked the answers of the other actors in the present social environment. The Cycle of “idea- answer- idea” is one of the methods and mechanisms of action that acts through the chains of action with formation of repeated dominant discourse. In this way, social experiences of the authors in this period, are as same as the ideological elements with positive and negative elements were recorded and written.
Full-Text [PDF 419 kb]   (663 Downloads)    
Article Type: practical |
Received: 2016/08/1 | Accepted: 2017/05/22 | Published: 2017/05/27

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA