Volume 4, Issue 16 (2011)
LCQ 2011, 4(16): 7-36 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khodayar I, Yuosofiyan M J, Elhamian M. The Dramatic Potentials of Prose Debates from a Dialogic Prespective: Prose Debates of Constitutional Era in Iran and the Domain of Persian Language in Central Asia. LCQ 2011; 4 (16) :7-36
URL: http://lcq.modares.ac.ir/article-29-6908-en.html
URL: http://lcq.modares.ac.ir/article-29-6908-en.html
1- Assistant prof.
2- Assistant
3- M.A
2- Assistant
3- M.A
Abstract: (9489 Views)
Debate is one of the literary prose types prevalent in Persian. In prose debates, two or more characters are presented in dialogue writing with each other and ultimately the authorsummarizestheir language and reaches a conclusion. The structure of these debates is mostly based on dialoguewriting. During the Constitutional era of Iran, these kinds of debates were regarded as ‘objectwriting’ or ‘theatrical writing.’ With respect to their formal structure and particularstyle of dialogue writing, it can be asked whether they can be read from a dramatic point of view. The dramatic tone and language, dialogue-based dramatic action, conflict, time and place are some of the identifiable aspects that are studied in this paper. The aim of this paper is to introduce a dialogue-based model for the study of the dramatic aspects of these debates. This model is proposed on the basis of a comparative study of dialogue in prose and drama as well as identifying commonalities between these two types of literature.
Received: 2011/12/14 | Accepted: 2012/03/17 | Published: 2013/02/8
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |